3

Asked the council to establish higher standards rather than a moratorium that threatens local jobs.

Noted that data center topics were already addressed at a previous meeting and urged the council to incorporate moratorium analysis into existing work plans.

Urged the council to follow examples set by other cities in developing comprehensive standards rather than bans.

Opposed the moratorium on behalf of Operating Engineers Local 3, citing the need for good local jobs.

Asked the council to reject the moratorium request, noting that data centers have operated responsibly in California for decades.

Asked the council to work with trade unions on standards rather than a moratorium that threatens jobs.

Urged the council to let staff complete their research and establish comprehensive standards instead of rushing a moratorium.

Supported agendizing the moratorium to protect the city legally and evaluate decommissioning costs and environmental impacts.

Opposed the moratorium, explaining that data centers use closed-loop water systems and provide clean, high-standard jobs.

Spoke as a planning commissioner in favor of a short-term moratorium to study cumulative environmental and energy impacts.

Opposed the data center moratorium, highlighting the local jobs provided by skilled mechanical contractors.

Opposed the moratorium, emphasizing the generational impact on union trades workers.

Urged the council to reject the moratorium and instead collaborate on sensible standards that protect local jobs.

Highlighted the training and safety standards of union workers in building critical infrastructure like data centers.

Emphasized the collaboration between unions and developers in building safe, sustainable projects in Santa Clara.

Shared details about his historic home nearby, asked about foundation resources and fixing signs, and raised questions about a nearby new adu-like construction.

Voiced frustration over the replacement of modest, affordable homes with massive two-story structures that block out sunlight.

The applicant's representative explained that splitting the property clears up title issues and helps the owner maintain the historic home.

The property owner confirmed plans to sell the smaller home to fund improvements for the historic house.

Requested a continuance of the downtown RFP item from a special meeting to a regular meeting to ensure proper public participation.

Expressed concerns regarding neighborhood compatibility, side yard setbacks, and privacy impacts for the property at 2892 Mesquite Drive.

Expressed support for the subdivision and sale if the proceeds are used to properly restore the neglected historic Victorian house at 906 Monroe Street.

Asked technical questions about property tax reassessment, SB 9 split restrictions, and future architectural review for the historic property.

Expressed frustration with Council Policy 030 regarding adding items to the agenda, citing difficulties for community members in getting downtown project discussions agendized.

A neighboring business owner expressed regret about having to speak against his neighbors but noted concerns about a smoke shop operating near his property.

The same speaker returned to offer further commentary on community issues and speech restrictions.